The 14th Amendment IS the Constitution. Specifically here, the Equal Protection Clause within it…

| Register

The 14th Amendment IS the Constitution. Specifically here, the Equal Protection Clause within it…

Author: BaronVonZemo (60622 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 12:45 pm on Aug 8, 2025

View All

and the SCOTUS reconfirmed this with its 2023 ruling.

I’ve told you this a few times, but you don’t like it. Thus, being the liberal that you are (but don’t want to admit), you won’t accept it.

Luckily, you and other racists have lost this battle.

This is the answer ti the previously unanswered question of “When does Affirmative Action ever end?”
Now. Race, gender, religion, sexual orientation discrimination ends now.

Replies to: "The 14th Amendment IS the Constitution. Specifically here, the Equal Protection Clause within it…"

U’s that want fed funds will need to submit detailed admissions data. [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 8:58pm 8/7/25 (24) [View All]
- This obsession with race is silly... on both sides. It only generates unnecessary tensions. - Curly1918 - 8:50am 8/8/25
  - You didn’t even know it was unconstitutional. “What’s the big deal?” Guess what? - BaronVonZemo - 9:04am 8/8/25
    - The decision you rely upon reversed decades of precedent upheld by SCOTUS in countless decisions. [LINK] - Curly1918 - 1:57pm 8/8/25
    - Title VII also prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion ... - LanceManion - 9:34am 8/8/25
      - Title VII is not the Constitution and the admission of qualified black folks is not discrimination. - Curly1918 - 10:10am 8/8/25
        The admission of less qualified black people over more qualified others is discrimination. - LanceManion - 12:55pm 8/8/25
        Define "qualified." [NT] - Curly1918 - 1:50pm 8/8/25
        Highest GPA and Test Scores with well-rounded extra-curriculars. [NT] - LanceManion - 2:30pm 8/8/25
        
        The 14th Amendment IS the Constitution. Specifically here, the Equal Protection Clause within it… - BaronVonZemo - 12:45pm 8/8/25
        Justice Roberts in the opinion you referenced: - Curly1918 - 1:49pm 8/8/25
        That’s just a snippet out of context. The ruling was clear. And more importantly, the - BaronVonZemo - 1:53pm 8/8/25
        No snippet in any Scotus opinion is inconsequential. They frequently open the door to subsequent - Curly1918 - 2:04pm 8/8/25
        No matter what I say or show you, your mind is fixed. Even the constitution (of which you were not - BaronVonZemo - 2:20pm 8/8/25
        
        It's also just wrongheaded thinking - you can't fix a supply problem by increasing demand [NT] - LanceManion - 12:57pm 8/8/25
- All this will just be undone by the next Democrat administration. - NedoftheHill - 9:59pm 8/7/25
  - True. In the mean time, real Americans at least feel empowered to speak up. - LanceManion - 5:58am 8/8/25
  - My question is: Who still wants this racist policy? - iairishcheeks - 12:02am 8/8/25
    - The benfactors of it, of course. And which party has that group as it’s key demographic? [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 9:05am 8/8/25
  - Agreed. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 11:12pm 8/7/25
- Interesting that the Newsmax article references the debunked argument against UCLA’s Med School… - TyroneIrish - 9:29pm 8/7/25
  - I read both articles. The LA Times article fails to address a number of key arguments - MarkHarman - 10:34pm 8/7/25
    - What specific issues do you have with the LAT article?...maybe I can shed some light on them. [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:13am 8/8/25
      - Try this - MarkHarman - 8:26am 8/8/25
        It's about results...read the LAT article again...the quality of admitted students didn't go down - TyroneIrish - 9:52am 8/8/25