He specifically said he relied on the BLS numbers when evaluating the strength of the economy...before the corrected numbers were issued. That provides a strong implication that if he had the corrected numbers, he might have made a different decision.
I'm not arguing a conspiracy theory. I'm just stating facts. You don't like the facts for some reason I haven't quite figured out (why don't you like these facts?), so you argue against them. I suppose you have a partisan narrative you need to push, and that narrative is threatened somehow by these facts. But, I'm not arguing your narrative. You can lie all you want; I don't really care.
This message has been edited 3 time(s).