UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

massive Wealth Inequality...

...here's a summary of why the flip side...e.g. elimination of government aid programs...can't be counted on...btw, what's your source for the Social Justice, insidious "Antii-Catholic" comment?...if Mother Teresa were around, she might have something to say about that.
-----------------------
AI Overview

Relying solely on private charity is insufficient to address societal needs due to several key limitations:

Addressing systemic issues

Charities are often designed to address immediate symptoms of problems rather than their root causes.

For example, according to the Harvard Political Review, charities may provide aid to individuals experiencing homelessness, but they cannot solve systemic issues like affordable housing shortages or lack of government benefits that contribute to the problem.

According to Stanford scholar Rob Reich, while charities like soup kitchens and shelters provide crucial assistance, without policy changes, problems like hunger and homelessness will persist.

Inequitable distribution of resources

Wealthy donors often direct their contributions to causes they personally prefer, such as higher education and medical centers, states Inequality.org.
This can lead to a disproportionate allocation of resources, where those most in need may not receive the assistance they require.
Furthermore, notes Inequality.org, only a small portion of charitable giving effectively transfers resources from the rich to the poor.

Lack of sustainability and predictability
Charitable giving can fluctuate, particularly during economic downturns, according to Giving Compass.
When the economy falters, individuals and organizations may reduce their donations, leaving charities with fewer resources at a time when demand for their services may be increasing.

For instance, during the Great Recession, total giving in the U.S. fell significantly, reports BetterWorld.

This unpredictability makes it difficult for charities to plan for the long term and guarantee sustained support for their beneficiaries.

Potential for reinforcing existing inequalities
Some argue that relying on private charity can inadvertently reinforce existing inequalities by allowing wealthy individuals to exert influence over social causes through their donations and the creation of private foundations.

The Nation suggests that philanthropy, when structured in a way that favors the interests of the wealthy, can become a platform for private power rather than solely serving the public good.

In conclusion, while private charity plays a vital role in providing immediate relief and addressing specific needs, it is not a sufficient solution for tackling systemic societal problems due to its limitations in addressing root causes, ensuring equitable resource distribution, guaranteeing sustainability, and potential for perpetuating inequalities. A comprehensive approach that combines charitable efforts with government policies and programs aimed at structural change is crucial for building a more just and equitable society.
--------------------