Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2025 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

It’s probably best you read what the judgement was.

Author: jimbasil (52984 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)
Posted at 11:53 am on Aug 21, 2025
View All

But first I’d like to point out how disappointing it is to know the many of on here claim law and order yet support a thief convict seeing his malfeasance as winning.

“A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out a half-billion dollar judgment against President Trump, eliminating the enormous financial penalty while declining to overturn the fraud case against him.

“While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award to the state,” wrote Peter Moulton, one of the appeals judges whose lengthy and convoluted ruling reflected significant disagreement among the five-judge panel.

The president’s appeal will now most likely move to New York’s highest court, providing him another opportunity to challenge the finding that he was a fraudster.

Thursday’s ruling handed Mr. Trump a financial victory and represents a major setback for the New York attorney general, Letitia James, who is one of the president’s foremost adversaries. The case had been a career-defining victory after she campaigned for the attorney general’s office promising to bring Mr. Trump to justice.
However, the decision fell short of the legal vindication the president had been seeking in his fight against Ms. James. In denying Mr. Trump’s bid to throw out the case, the court kept in place the ruling that he had committed fraud, an ignominious distinction for a sitting American president.

Ms. James filed the case against Mr. Trump and his family real estate business in 2022, accusing them of inflating his net worth to obtain favorable loan terms. After a monthslong trial, the judge overseeing the case ruled last year that Mr. Trump was liable for fraud, denting the real estate mogul image that underpinned his political rise.

Thursday’s ruling came almost a year after judges heard oral arguments on the appeals case, an unusual delay that reflected the legal and political complexities of a case against a sitting president. The case infuriated Mr. Trump, who has sought revenge against Ms. James. His Justice Department has opened multiple cases into her and her office.”


Link: His revenge tour continues, thank you SCOTUS

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk

Replies to: "It’s probably best you read what the judgement was."

  • First of the anti-Trump lawfare cases rightly blown TF up. [NT] [LINK] - LanceManion - 11:10am 8/21/25 (20) [View All]
    • LOL...your article just says the Appellate Court found the Penalty to be excessive...NOT that DJT is - TyroneIrish - 11:59am 8/21/25
      • LOL indeed. Lawfare made a huge contribution to Trump's electoral victory. [NT] - Curly1918 - 1:29pm 8/21/25
        • You can claim 'Lawfare', but former SDNY Attorney, Geoffrey Berman, can prove it with Trump's AG, - TyroneIrish - 5:01pm 8/21/25
      • Let's wait for the NY Court of Appeals to rule. - Curly1918 - 1:16pm 8/21/25
      • No way this court would overturn the ruling, They are protecting Laetitia from a false prosecution - LanceManion - 12:48pm 8/21/25
        • Right, the evidence that shows he made fraudulent claims doesn't count, it's how LanceM feels - jimbasil - 12:51pm 8/21/25
          • Elements of fraud - Curly1918 - 1:28pm 8/21/25
            • From the NYT article.."...the court effectively upheld the fraud judgment against the president..", - TyroneIrish - 4:49pm 8/21/25
      • there were mulitple opinions. One judge wanted the entire case overturned, I think two thought - irish93 - 12:02pm 8/21/25
        • Indeed...we shall see...but keep in mind that DJT's Accounting Firm, Mazars, testified that they - TyroneIrish - 12:16pm 8/21/25
    • It’s probably best you read what the judgement was. [LINK] - jimbasil - 11:53am 8/21/25
      • Anything to keep that false conviction on the books. You guys lost for a reason. - LanceManion - 12:49pm 8/21/25
      • Do you "claim law and order?" Should all laws be enforced impartially? [NT] - NedoftheHill - 12:03pm 8/21/25
        • Maybe if you have an actual question you will write it in English. [NT] - jimbasil - 12:17pm 8/21/25
          • Maybe you could answer "yes" to both questions. They are clearly stated. [NT] - Hensou - 12:20pm 8/21/25
            • He avoids answering. He know he doesn't support law enforcement... - NedoftheHill - 1:10pm 8/21/25
    • Members of the Bar who support this political lawfare by Democrats should be ashamed, right conor? [NT] - NedoftheHill - 11:28am 8/21/25
      • I reject your premise. Ask another question. [NT] - conorlarkin - 2:29pm 8/21/25
    • They will get him sooner or later. Are the walls still closing in? [NT] [IMAGE] - TampaIrish - 11:25am 8/21/25
    • more winning! [NT] - WestCoastIrishFan - 11:11am 8/21/25
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS