You provided a false statement as a material fact
You knew the information was incorrect
You intended to deceive the victim
The victim relied on your false statement
They suffered damage as a result of relying on your knowingly false information
MOREOVER: The New York Court of Appeals is likely to rule that NY's Consumer Protection Statue was never intended to cover big boy real estate deals.
BUT,,, this case probably bolstered Trump's campaign. Letitia was hoisted on her own petard.
Replies to: "Elements of fraud"
- First of the anti-Trump lawfare cases rightly blown TF up. [NT]
[LINK]
- LanceManion - 11:10am 8/21/25
(20) [View All]
- LOL...your article just says the Appellate Court found the Penalty to be excessive...NOT that DJT is - TyroneIrish - 11:59am 8/21/25
- LOL indeed. Lawfare made a huge contribution to Trump's electoral victory. [NT]
- Curly1918 - 1:29pm 8/21/25
- You can claim 'Lawfare', but former SDNY Attorney, Geoffrey Berman, can prove it with Trump's AG, - TyroneIrish - 5:01pm 8/21/25
- Let's wait for the NY Court of Appeals to rule. - Curly1918 - 1:16pm 8/21/25
- No way this court would overturn the ruling, They are protecting Laetitia from a false prosecution - LanceManion - 12:48pm 8/21/25
- Right, the evidence that shows he made fraudulent claims doesn't count, it's how LanceM feels - jimbasil - 12:51pm 8/21/25
- Elements of fraud - Curly1918 - 1:28pm 8/21/25
- From the NYT article.."...the court effectively upheld the fraud judgment against the president..", - TyroneIrish - 4:49pm 8/21/25
- Elements of fraud - Curly1918 - 1:28pm 8/21/25
- Right, the evidence that shows he made fraudulent claims doesn't count, it's how LanceM feels - jimbasil - 12:51pm 8/21/25
- there were mulitple opinions. One judge wanted the entire case overturned, I think two thought - irish93 - 12:02pm 8/21/25
- Indeed...we shall see...but keep in mind that DJT's Accounting Firm, Mazars, testified that they - TyroneIrish - 12:16pm 8/21/25
- LOL indeed. Lawfare made a huge contribution to Trump's electoral victory. [NT]
- Curly1918 - 1:29pm 8/21/25
- It’s probably best you read what the judgement was. [LINK]
- jimbasil - 11:53am 8/21/25
- Anything to keep that false conviction on the books. You guys lost for a reason. - LanceManion - 12:49pm 8/21/25
- Do you "claim law and order?" Should all laws be enforced impartially? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 12:03pm 8/21/25
- Maybe if you have an actual question you will write it in English. [NT]
- jimbasil - 12:17pm 8/21/25
- Maybe you could answer "yes" to both questions. They are clearly stated. [NT]
- Hensou - 12:20pm 8/21/25
- He avoids answering. He know he doesn't support law enforcement... - NedoftheHill - 1:10pm 8/21/25
- Maybe you could answer "yes" to both questions. They are clearly stated. [NT]
- Hensou - 12:20pm 8/21/25
- Maybe if you have an actual question you will write it in English. [NT]
- jimbasil - 12:17pm 8/21/25
- Members of the Bar who support this political lawfare by Democrats should be ashamed, right conor? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 11:28am 8/21/25
- I reject your premise. Ask another question. [NT] - conorlarkin - 2:29pm 8/21/25
- They will get him sooner or later. Are the walls still closing in? [NT] [IMAGE] - TampaIrish - 11:25am 8/21/25
- more winning! [NT] - WestCoastIrishFan - 11:11am 8/21/25
- LOL...your article just says the Appellate Court found the Penalty to be excessive...NOT that DJT is - TyroneIrish - 11:59am 8/21/25