We have seen more and more AI use from a few posters here on this board (who they are is not important at this time).
Instead of backing up their opinions with their own reasoning and experiences, they lazily request a defense of what they already want to believe rather than explain (and thus better consider) their own reasons for their stance.
It’s really disappointing because it misses the point of what is the real value of these discussions. The AI product is sterile and prepackaged and inauthentic. It’s use also implies that the user is no longer thinking for himself - not only in the construction of the post, but on what views they carry on an issue. It presumes, “I believe whatever my tribe wants to support, so I’ll use an AI programmed for my tribe to formulate the thoughts that I will incorporate as my own”
It’s’ unnecessary because nobody is giving out grades.
It’s embarrassing for them because the sudden change in writing style is painfully obvious after reading thousands of posts from the poster already.
I’ll repeat my motto: You don’t have to agree, just be genuine in your beliefs and make an effort because you’re asking others to make the effort to read and consider your post.