UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

I have more to add on this if you're interested...just ask...but for the moment, AI has provided a good service on that question...and note that it is amazingly quick...a tremendous benefit for those with short attention spans ;-)
------------------
AI Overview
Nuclear power benefits and spent nuclear fuel risks: a complex trade-off
The question of whether the benefits of nuclear power outweigh the risks associated with the transport and storage of spent nuclear fuel is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides.
Potential benefits of nuclear power
Low carbon emissions: Nuclear power plants do not directly emit greenhouse gases during operation, making them an important option in efforts to combat climate change and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
High energy density: Nuclear fuel, primarily uranium, contains a significantly higher energy density compared to other energy sources, meaning that relatively small amounts of fuel can generate substantial amounts of electricity.
Reliable and consistent power: Nuclear power plants provide a reliable and consistent source of electricity, unlike intermittent renewable sources like solar and wind, which are dependent on weather conditions.
Risks associated with spent nuclear fuel
Radioactive waste: Spent nuclear fuel is highly radioactive and remains a hazard for thousands of years, requiring secure and long-term storage or disposal solutions.
Transportation risks: Transporting spent nuclear fuel carries the risk of accidents and potential release of radioactive materials, although robust safety measures are in place.
Storage and disposal challenges: Current storage methods include on-site spent fuel pools and dry casks, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists. However, a permanent geological repository for spent nuclear fuel has not yet been established in the United States, raising concerns about the long-term management of this hazardous material. Finland's Onkalo repository, on the other hand, is expected to start operating in 2024 and will be the first deep geological repository licensed for the disposal of used fuel from civil reactors.
Balancing benefits and risks
The ongoing debate centers on finding the right balance between the benefits of nuclear power in addressing climate change and the need to responsibly manage the risks associated with spent nuclear fuel.
One potential solution lies in developing and deploying advanced reactor designs, including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), which may offer increased safety features and potentially reduce the amount of waste generated. In addition, explore the possibility of reprocessing and recycling spent nuclear fuel to minimize the volume of radioactive waste.
Conclusion
The decision of whether to invest in nuclear power requires careful consideration of its potential to mitigate climate change alongside the risks associated with spent nuclear fuel. It necessitates robust safety measures, development of long-term storage or disposal solutions, and public engagement to build trust and address concerns.
-------------------