discredited for a lack of scientific rigor. I read two of those studies to help myself understand why...again, Risch didn't conduct a single study himself. So, if he couldn't spot faulty work and was publicly rebuked by his peers at Yale and by his Co-Editors at the Journal of Epidemiology for supporting HCQ as a therapy, there is no reason why I, or anyone else, should have to read pure drivel...just because you want me to waste my time on an issue that was dead and buried before I joined the Open Forum.
I have a very good reason for not reading that worthless paper...and I've provided substantive evidence why that's the case. Just satisfying your petulance is not a sufficient reason to do so...and it's counter-productive to the public good.
Not true, Mark...Risch wrote an 'Opinion Piece' on 5 studies...at least two of which were soundly
Replies to: "Not true, Mark...Risch wrote an 'Opinion Piece' on 5 studies...at least two of which were soundly"
- "All you need to know about ELP is that he's afraid to read opposing views" - TyroneIrish - MarkHarman - 7:42pm 8/25/25
(2) [View All]
- Not true, Mark...Risch wrote an 'Opinion Piece' on 5 studies...at least two of which were soundly - TyroneIrish - 9:41pm 8/25/25
- Can you please drop your whacky Covid BS? No one cares [NT] - Domer From Hell - 8:31pm 8/25/25