My guess is he feels he's protecting California somehow. No real idea and certainly not worth spending any time on.
The issue is how much of aid gets eaten up as it cycles through non-profits. There doesn't have to be "fraud" per se but, if administrative costs eat up nearly all of the aid, what is the difference to the people who are supposed to receive the assistance?
It's a valid concern worth exploring. (Anyone who involves a non-profit should do a due diligence on how much of the money donated actually gets to those in need. Those running FireAid should have done that and been honest and transparent about the money going to victims of the disaster. It seems they didn't really care and just mouthed that all the money was going to those in need.)
Immediately one guy rides in with irrelevant information. The next tries to hijack the subject to get people arguing about something other than the topic because he has a singular agenda he is trying to further.