of significance to someone else's post.
Let's see how that works prof.:
1) A point is made that you don't like
2) You try to reframe the post into something different that you can refute (your strawman).
3) For added effect, you falsely accuse the other poster of doing what you are actually doing (making a strawman argument) - Rule #1
4 )When called out for your falsehood, you try to deflect by assigning new, nonspecific, parameters to the other poster's point so that you can try to dismiss it using your self chosen parameters and in which you get to be the arbiter of what "significance" means.
No. My original post is correct as written as well as accurate.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).