Interesting. I just figured that was some common ground we could reach. I didn't realize Democrats thought it was important for the president to have the ability to not sign his executive orders or laws passed by Congress.
I wasn't making a point about Biden, or Obama (as far as I know, the only presidents to use auto-pen, but if you want to counter that, I'm open to more information in that regard). I wasn't trying to attack them. I was just asking if we could agree that in the abstract, as a general proposition, using an auto-pen opened the door to potential abuses, and couldn't we all agree that POTUS sign things personally...and maybe even with witnesses if possible.
This message has been edited 3 time(s).