coverage for Pre-Existing Conditions...and charging you for MUCH more than 15-20% Overhead Expenses.
Today, 46M Americans are able to afford HC, who wouldn't have before the ACA. That's a Very Good thing.
Now, where's that 'Big Beautiful Health Care Bill' the GOP has been touting for the last 15 years?
ADVERTISEMENT
You should ask yourself what the Insurance Companies were doing BEFORE the ACA...like denying you
Replies to: "You should ask yourself what the Insurance Companies were doing BEFORE the ACA...like denying you"
- pretty interesting explanation of ACA. [NT]
[LINK]
- WestCoastIrishFan - 8:23am 11/11/25
(7) [View All]
- You should ask yourself what the Insurance Companies were doing BEFORE the ACA...like denying you - TyroneIrish - 11:33am 11/11/25
- That's a red herring. All it took was a simple HIPAA amendment to eliminate pre-existing condition - LanceManion - 11:38am 11/11/25
- Not a red herring...coverage for pre-existing conditions was perhaps the most notable ACA benefit... - TyroneIrish - 3:35pm 11/11/25
- That's a red herring. All it took was a simple HIPAA amendment to eliminate pre-existing condition - LanceManion - 11:38am 11/11/25
- The data proves it. [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 11:05am 11/11/25
- And now you know who paid to get Obama elected. This was never intended to create single payor. - LanceManion - 9:34am 11/11/25
- The minute the industry to be regulated write the regulations you know there’s a problem [NT] - WestCoastIrishFan - 10:09am 11/11/25
- Anything the government subsidizes experiences inflation. Student loans are another prime example. - Curly1918 - 8:50am 11/11/25
- You should ask yourself what the Insurance Companies were doing BEFORE the ACA...like denying you - TyroneIrish - 11:33am 11/11/25
Consent Management