Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2025 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

So you clearly never listen to SC arguments. Katyal did a good job, but that's pretty standard

Author: LanceManion (9024 Posts - Joined: Jul 16, 2010)
Posted at 8:09 am on Nov 14, 2025
View All

And I don't know that you can conclude that Alito is in the bag for Trump based on that. He was asking three pertinent questions:

1. How do you deal with the practical issues implicated by this (i.e., tariffs are already out of the bag); and
2. How would you account for the situation where the Trump administration argues that it has tariff authority under other law (3(38)? And especially since this case was expedited?
3. How do you reconcile this decision with respect to delegation versus other decisions?

Those are fair SC questions of a Constitutional lawyer. And he was in good humor with Katyal at the end.

What I believe the Court is suggesting there is that the Administration may lose but that it should immediately refile and amend its argument to offer other authority for the tariffs.


Imposing corporate abuse, neglect and greed on deserving victims.

Replies to: "So you clearly never listen to SC arguments. Katyal did a good job, but that's pretty standard"

  • Neal Katyal out distances Alito on DJT tariffs. [LINK] - jimbasil - 1:34am 11/14/25 (7) [View All]
    • So you clearly never listen to SC arguments. Katyal did a good job, but that's pretty standard - LanceManion - 8:09am 11/14/25
      • Clearly you didn’t listen to the exchange - and clearly, you didn’t and don’t know - jimbasil - 10:42am 11/14/25
        • Well, then you are just a bad listener because you are reading things into the conversation. [NT] - LanceManion - 11:53am 11/14/25
      • The practical issues are enormous. SCOTUS could be reversing completed trade policy. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:51am 11/14/25
    • The Court has never placed ideology over jurisprudence as much as this Bench. [LINK] - conorlarkin - 7:53am 11/14/25
      • Project 2025 has targeted the courts [NT] [LINK] - jimbasil - 10:51am 11/14/25
      • More perspective — [NT] [LINK] - conorlarkin - 7:57am 11/14/25
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS