what was being said during the Q and responses.
And if you did you would note that Alito is offering DJT attorneys a path for an argument that would sit well with the court but then Katyal calls him out on that to inform Alito there is no path. That’s the humor, Alito got caught trying to redirect the issue and he knew it.
And I follow the court often.
Replies to: "Clearly you didn’t listen to the exchange - and clearly, you didn’t and don’t know"
- Neal Katyal out distances Alito on DJT tariffs. [LINK]
- jimbasil - 1:34am 11/14/25
(7) [View All]
- So you clearly never listen to SC arguments. Katyal did a good job, but that's pretty standard - LanceManion - 8:09am 11/14/25
- Clearly you didn’t listen to the exchange - and clearly, you didn’t and don’t know - jimbasil - 10:42am 11/14/25
- Well, then you are just a bad listener because you are reading things into the conversation. [NT] - LanceManion - 11:53am 11/14/25
- The practical issues are enormous. SCOTUS could be reversing completed trade policy. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 9:51am 11/14/25
- Clearly you didn’t listen to the exchange - and clearly, you didn’t and don’t know - jimbasil - 10:42am 11/14/25
- The Court has never placed ideology over jurisprudence as much as this Bench. [LINK]
- conorlarkin - 7:53am 11/14/25
- Project 2025 has targeted the courts [NT] [LINK] - jimbasil - 10:51am 11/14/25
- More perspective — [NT] [LINK] - conorlarkin - 7:57am 11/14/25
- So you clearly never listen to SC arguments. Katyal did a good job, but that's pretty standard - LanceManion - 8:09am 11/14/25