no one should want environmental fanaticism to strangle growth.
Where would NYC be today if our environmental laws were on the books and enforced in the 18th and 19th centuries?
On the other hand, how horribly polluted would our water be without reasonable restrictions on discharges?
Replies to: "It is a tough issue. No one should want helter-skelter development and..."
- Industry and republicans vs clean water act and America’s wetlands. - jimbasil - 8:05am 11/19/25
(13) [View All]
- Says the guy who took a steaming dump in pristine iceberg ice melt. [NT] - LanceManion - 2:13pm 11/19/25
- One of the problems with the modern environmental movement, - Rooney - 1:09pm 11/19/25
- Or, you’re just talking about profit being greater at the expense of wildlife. [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:01pm 11/19/25
- Nowhere did I say that. - Rooney - 3:58pm 11/19/25
- Over protection is a baloney term. Land is either protected or it’s not. Knowing developers - jimbasil - 5:18pm 11/19/25
- Nowhere did I say that. - Rooney - 3:58pm 11/19/25
- Makes great sense. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 1:22pm 11/19/25
- Or, you’re just talking about profit being greater at the expense of wildlife. [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:01pm 11/19/25
- Post a picture of the "wetlands" at issue in Sackett v EPA - Iggle - 10:21am 11/19/25
- Super glad you read the article [NT] - jimbasil - 11:01am 11/19/25
- Farmers farm up to the waters edge, the clean water act doesn't prevent this. - iairishcheeks - 9:52am 11/19/25
- It is a tough issue. No one should want helter-skelter development and... [IMAGE]
- Curly1918 - 8:46am 11/19/25
- Indeed it is a tough issue...for example, after the Fukushima disaster it was found that EPA - TyroneIrish - 1:10pm 11/19/25
- then it’s a good thing you didn’t read the article. [NT]
- jimbasil - 9:26am 11/19/25
- I've followed this issue for years. There are fanatics on both sides. [NT] - Curly1918 - 11:32am 11/19/25