up close, for them it’s about profit and nothing else.
Yes, there are regulations that don’t apply well to all circumstances but that’s the nature of regulations.
Replies to: "Over protection is a baloney term. Land is either protected or it’s not. Knowing developers"
- Industry and republicans vs clean water act and America’s wetlands. - jimbasil - 8:05am 11/19/25
(14) [View All]
- Says the guy who took a steaming dump in pristine iceberg ice melt. [NT] - LanceManion - 2:13pm 11/19/25
- One of the problems with the modern environmental movement, - Rooney - 1:09pm 11/19/25
- Or, you’re just talking about profit being greater at the expense of wildlife. [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:01pm 11/19/25
- Nowhere did I say that. - Rooney - 3:58pm 11/19/25
- Over protection is a baloney term. Land is either protected or it’s not. Knowing developers - jimbasil - 5:18pm 11/19/25
- You've certainly not convinced me of your deep knowledge of this issue. - Rooney - 5:40pm 11/19/25
- Over protection is a baloney term. Land is either protected or it’s not. Knowing developers - jimbasil - 5:18pm 11/19/25
- Nowhere did I say that. - Rooney - 3:58pm 11/19/25
- Makes great sense. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 1:22pm 11/19/25
- Or, you’re just talking about profit being greater at the expense of wildlife. [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:01pm 11/19/25
- Post a picture of the "wetlands" at issue in Sackett v EPA - Iggle - 10:21am 11/19/25
- Super glad you read the article [NT] - jimbasil - 11:01am 11/19/25
- Farmers farm up to the waters edge, the clean water act doesn't prevent this. - iairishcheeks - 9:52am 11/19/25
- It is a tough issue. No one should want helter-skelter development and... [IMAGE]
- Curly1918 - 8:46am 11/19/25
- Indeed it is a tough issue...for example, after the Fukushima disaster it was found that EPA - TyroneIrish - 1:10pm 11/19/25
- then it’s a good thing you didn’t read the article. [NT]
- jimbasil - 9:26am 11/19/25
- I've followed this issue for years. There are fanatics on both sides. [NT] - Curly1918 - 11:32am 11/19/25