"The judge tossed out the cases “without prejudice,” leaving open the possibility that the cases against Comey and James can be brought again alleging the same conduct."
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Replies to: "Not defined as "malicious" by the judge."
- Two malicious prosecutions dismissed [LINK]
- Chris94 - 1:15pm 11/24/25
(18) [View All]
- A malicious dismissal. :) [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 6:27pm 11/24/25
- Cult member! [NT] - jimbasil - 9:34pm 11/24/25
- There’s a reason DOJ never had career prosecutors take a loyalty test. Until this Administration. [NT] - conorlarkin - 3:17pm 11/24/25
- “I know only the best people!” [NT] - jimbasil - 2:19pm 11/24/25
- Another idiot judge, the rulings will not stand of course. - PaND - 1:28pm 11/24/25
- There's a reason prior DOJ Prosecutors refused to take those cases...and it had to do with a lack of - TyroneIrish - 2:22pm 11/24/25
- Not defined as "malicious" by the judge. - Hensou - 1:23pm 11/24/25
- Defined as "malicious" by me, so thanks for your pointless input. [NT]
- Chris94 - 1:43pm 11/24/25
- That was actually helpful input. I thought you were saying they were dismissed as malicious. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 6:42pm 11/24/25
- I thought the same thing. - iairishcheeks - 8:36pm 11/24/25
- My point is that your use of the term "malicious" is pointless as you have no standing in this case. - Hensou - 2:24pm 11/24/25
- Wait - are you saying that a message board poster has no standing in a federal case?! - Chris94 - 3:08pm 11/24/25
- Just remember you're talking to a World Class, Anal-Retentive Nitpicker...it'll only get worse ;-) [NT]
- TyroneIrish - 4:10pm 11/24/25
- Truer words and such [NT] - Domer From Hell - 4:19pm 11/24/25
- Then don't make a federal case out of your descriptor. Science! [NT] - Hensou - 3:43pm 11/24/25
- Just remember you're talking to a World Class, Anal-Retentive Nitpicker...it'll only get worse ;-) [NT]
- TyroneIrish - 4:10pm 11/24/25
- Wait - are you saying that a message board poster has no standing in a federal case?! - Chris94 - 3:08pm 11/24/25
- That was actually helpful input. I thought you were saying they were dismissed as malicious. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 6:42pm 11/24/25
- Barring the Trump admin's pension for effing things up, do you feel the govt has a strong case? [NT]
- Quest4twelve - 1:24pm 11/24/25
- I think you meant penchant not pension. [NT]
- THEISMANCARR - 2:23pm 11/24/25
- Now you have him confused, again [NT] - ColeyO - 5:12pm 11/24/25
- I think you meant penchant not pension. [NT]
- THEISMANCARR - 2:23pm 11/24/25
- Defined as "malicious" by me, so thanks for your pointless input. [NT]
- Chris94 - 1:43pm 11/24/25
- A malicious dismissal. :) [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 6:27pm 11/24/25