"Currie, however, denied a request to bar the Justice Department from seeking to indict them again under a lawfully appointed prosecutor." Do you ever read the articles?
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Replies to: "Another idiot judge, the rulings will not stand of course."
- Two malicious prosecutions dismissed [LINK]
- Chris94 - 1:15pm 11/24/25
(18) [View All]
- A malicious dismissal. :) [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 6:27pm 11/24/25
- Cult member! [NT] - jimbasil - 9:34pm 11/24/25
- There’s a reason DOJ never had career prosecutors take a loyalty test. Until this Administration. [NT] - conorlarkin - 3:17pm 11/24/25
- “I know only the best people!” [NT] - jimbasil - 2:19pm 11/24/25
- Another idiot judge, the rulings will not stand of course. - PaND - 1:28pm 11/24/25
- There's a reason prior DOJ Prosecutors refused to take those cases...and it had to do with a lack of - TyroneIrish - 2:22pm 11/24/25
- Not defined as "malicious" by the judge. - Hensou - 1:23pm 11/24/25
- Defined as "malicious" by me, so thanks for your pointless input. [NT]
- Chris94 - 1:43pm 11/24/25
- That was actually helpful input. I thought you were saying they were dismissed as malicious. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 6:42pm 11/24/25
- I thought the same thing. - iairishcheeks - 8:36pm 11/24/25
- My point is that your use of the term "malicious" is pointless as you have no standing in this case. - Hensou - 2:24pm 11/24/25
- Wait - are you saying that a message board poster has no standing in a federal case?! - Chris94 - 3:08pm 11/24/25
- Just remember you're talking to a World Class, Anal-Retentive Nitpicker...it'll only get worse ;-) [NT]
- TyroneIrish - 4:10pm 11/24/25
- Truer words and such [NT] - Domer From Hell - 4:19pm 11/24/25
- Then don't make a federal case out of your descriptor. Science! [NT] - Hensou - 3:43pm 11/24/25
- Just remember you're talking to a World Class, Anal-Retentive Nitpicker...it'll only get worse ;-) [NT]
- TyroneIrish - 4:10pm 11/24/25
- Wait - are you saying that a message board poster has no standing in a federal case?! - Chris94 - 3:08pm 11/24/25
- That was actually helpful input. I thought you were saying they were dismissed as malicious. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 6:42pm 11/24/25
- Barring the Trump admin's pension for effing things up, do you feel the govt has a strong case? [NT]
- Quest4twelve - 1:24pm 11/24/25
- I think you meant penchant not pension. [NT]
- THEISMANCARR - 2:23pm 11/24/25
- Now you have him confused, again [NT] - ColeyO - 5:12pm 11/24/25
- I think you meant penchant not pension. [NT]
- THEISMANCARR - 2:23pm 11/24/25
- Defined as "malicious" by me, so thanks for your pointless input. [NT]
- Chris94 - 1:43pm 11/24/25
- A malicious dismissal. :) [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 6:27pm 11/24/25