ADVERTISEMENT
(no message)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Replies to: "Yep. Hegseth first, then the admiral, for executing an illegal order."
- I totally stand behind Adm Bradley. He acted on his own, you know, like a hero. [LINK]
- Chris94 - 8:36pm 12/1/25
(10) [View All]
- Any doubt that Hegseth is drinking again? [NT] - conorlarkin - 10:07pm 12/1/25
- Would you prosecute him for war crimes? If not, why not? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 9:17pm 12/1/25
- Yep. Hegseth first, then the admiral, for executing an illegal order. [NT] - Chris94 - 11:58pm 12/1/25
- Defense Department Law of War Manual 18.3.2.1 — - conorlarkin - 9:59pm 12/1/25
- Geez, conor. I wasn't asking about the law; I was asking if Chris/Dems would prosecute the military. - NedoftheHill - 2:21am 12/2/25
- Wouldn’t the law be the starting point? Then apply the facts. - conorlarkin - 3:36am 12/2/25
- But since this was not a war, then it’s murder. Time for Trump to issue more pardons. [NT]
- conorlarkin - 10:23pm 12/1/25
- We haven't had a war since 1945. Do you think the law of war might apply in non-war conflicts? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:22am 12/2/25
- Don’t be daft. [NT] [LINK] - conorlarkin - 3:33am 12/2/25
- Are you drunk? [NT] - jimbasil - 2:43am 12/2/25
- We haven't had a war since 1945. Do you think the law of war might apply in non-war conflicts? [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 2:22am 12/2/25
- Geez, conor. I wasn't asking about the law; I was asking if Chris/Dems would prosecute the military. - NedoftheHill - 2:21am 12/2/25