UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

...so, O'Donnell was absolutely correct. Here's an excerpt from the ACLU's summary of this issue...
----------------------
The court granted absolute immunity to President Trump’s use of the Justice Department for fraudulent purposes. With respect to other allegations in the indictment, it sent the case back to the lower courts to determine whether actions for which former President Trump has been charged were official acts or personal acts, and whether the government can rebut the presumption that former President Trump is immune for those official acts. The court did reject former President Trump’s claim to absolute immunity for all acts unless convicted after an impeachment trial, characterizing its ruling as endorsing a “far broader immunity than the limited one” the court “recognized” today.

The American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of the District of Columbia filed a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that the U.S. Constitution and decades of Supreme Court precedent support the principle that nobody is above the law — even the president. While the court found that a president’s actions as a private individual are not immune to criminal prosecution, it held that presidents do have substantial immunity for their official actions – even when undertaken for personal ends and criminal purposes.
---------------------

And, if you pay attention to news sources that publicly provide their Code of Journalistic Ethics, like MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), rather than those that don't...e.g. FOX who had to pay $787M for Knowingly publishing False Statements,..you won't have to be corrected so often.


Link: https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/supreme-court-grants-trump-broad-immunity-for-official-acts-placing-presidents-above-the-law