UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

...you really are a pathetic MAGA...with zero credibility.

AI Overview

Yes, Senator James Lankford ultimately voted against advancing the bipartisan border bill in May 2024, not because he disavowed the bill's substance (which he helped craft), but because he felt the process had become a political stunt and "show vote" with no real intent to pass it, despite his prior support and work on it. He expressed frustration that the bill, which he considered the strongest border security measure in decades, was being used for messaging rather than solving the crisis, and he voted "no" to protest the "unserious process".

Key Points:
Original Negotiator: Lankford was a lead negotiator for the bill, which aimed to overhaul immigration law with conservative provisions.

Shift in Stance (Process, Not Policy): He maintained the bill was good policy but opposed the specific procedural vote in May because it was a political maneuver, not a genuine effort to legislate, which is why he voted "no".

Criticism of Both Parties: Lankford criticized Democrats for using the bill as a "political football" and Republicans for killing it, even though many later told him they regretted it.

"Stunt Vote": He described the May vote as a "stunt vote" and an "opportunity for people to send fundraising emails," not a real attempt at problem-solving.
-------------------