Can anyone give a compelling reason to take Greeland

| Register

Can anyone give a compelling reason to take Greeland - and destroy NATO?

Author: Chris94 (38308 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 3:40 pm on Jan 6, 2026

View All

Miller and the other admin dopes just yell about how it is obvious that Greenland should be part of the United States. They have never given one reason that we need it.

Replies to: "Can anyone give a compelling reason to take Greeland - and destroy NATO?"

Frightening and sinister - Stephen Miller “top aide to President - jimbasil - 3:17pm 1/6/26 (34) [View All]
- Can anyone give a compelling reason to take Greeland - and destroy NATO? - Chris94 - 3:40pm 1/6/26
  - Greenland...Trump is handling it poorly, IMO. - NedoftheHill - 5:26pm 1/7/26
  - Vlad can! [NT] - ND521 - 10:28pm 1/6/26
  - American power was formed via our relationships with allies. Trump is blowing that all up. - conorlarkin - 6:51pm 1/6/26
    - Why have our allies been leeching off us for years? [NT] - Hensou - 8:22pm 1/6/26
      - Yes! Cut 'em off. Cease all trade with them. America will go it alone!! [NT] - conorlarkin - 9:21pm 1/6/26
        Don’t be stupid. Just hold them accountable. [NT] - Hensou - 10:26pm 1/6/26
  - Given Trump's support for Putin, taking Greenland would make things easier for Vlad...and destroying - TyroneIrish - 6:23pm 1/6/26
  - It's "Greenland" and Trump is unlikely to invade. Politico offered a sane analysis last year. [NT] [LINK] - Hensou - 6:17pm 1/6/26
    - Yes, I mistyped. Board idiots celebrate. [NT] - Chris94 - 6:21pm 1/6/26
      - Yes, it’s a good time to be a democrat. [NT] - Hensou - 10:47pm 1/6/26
  - Even if anyone did give a compelling reason, it would be dismissed outright because it's Trump. [NT] - ELP - 5:57pm 1/6/26
    - The point is that NO ONE has been able to give a compelling reason. - Chris94 - 6:06pm 1/6/26
      - National security. DJT's words, not mine. He said Russia & China ships are all round the area. [NT] - ELP - 6:47pm 1/6/26
        He's lying. - Chris94 - 7:11pm 1/6/26
        See. That's is your predictable response to a compelling reason. Told you so. - ELP - 8:08pm 1/6/26
        "National Security" is a vague generality, not a compelling reason for anything. - Chris94 - 8:29pm 1/6/26
        What's pointless is trying to give you an explanation because no explanation will be good enough. - ELP - 11:05pm 1/6/26
        How about just one explanation? [NT] - Chris94 - 11:20pm 1/6/26
        WH gave an explanation but you just don't like it because they said it. [NT] - ELP - 2:58am 1/7/26
      - You're right, it doesn't make any sense other than imperial acquisition of resources. - iairishcheeks - 6:23pm 1/6/26
        I bet, like Scotland, if the Greenlanders wanted independence, they could get it with a referendum - Chris94 - 6:28pm 1/6/26
        It would make a lot more sense to associate with Canada where most of the other Inuits live. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 6:37pm 1/6/26
        Sure, whatever. No one in the USA makes that call. [NT] - Chris94 - 6:42pm 1/6/26
        Colonizer! [NT] - iairishcheeks - 7:22pm 1/6/26
  - Why does Denmark need it? - iairishcheeks - 4:08pm 1/6/26
    - Huh? [NT] - jimbasil - 4:15pm 1/6/26
      - Is Greenland a topic you're willing to discuss without a chaperone? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 6:07pm 1/6/26
    - That's not the question [NT] - Chris94 - 4:10pm 1/6/26
      - It makes no sense as a territory of Denmark, especially considering the civil rights abuses. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 4:37pm 1/6/26
        Again, not the relevant point. It's not like Trump is going to hand it to the natives. - Chris94 - 4:39pm 1/6/26
        I am in favor of an independent or self-determinate Greenland - iairishcheeks - 4:55pm 1/6/26
  - Idiotic Trumper rationale incoming.. [NT] - Domer From Hell - 4:03pm 1/6/26

Consent Management