Rightly or wrongly, law enforcement agents will shoot when this happens. LEO's treat the vehicle as a firearm. If it is pointed at them and advances, they will shoot, and they are never held accountable. She pointed it at them, and advanced. I believe her goal was to continue past him, but she did put it in drive and advanced (the wheels even spun for a split second, so she gunned it) when the wheels were pointed directly at the ICE agent. As far as this instance is concerned, it is as if she had a gun, and aimed it at him temporarily while turning to walk away (although the LEO couldn't know her intent). LEO's will shoot when that happens. If it where a firearm, and it gets pointed at them once, they won't wait to see if it is pointed at them again.
Now, I have often thought that LEO's fire too quickly when it comes to the risk of people using vehicles as deadly weapons, and it seems a reasonable debate to have...set some rules. But this ICE agent did what any LEO would do...again, rightly or wrongly. Heck, even if the LEO is on the side, the will often fire because of the risk of falling under the rear tire. Again, I'm not sure this should be the law, but most states allow that.
If it were me, I would stop and follow the instructions of the law enforcement officers...even if the officers are wrong or are being unreasonable in that moment. I'm not sure why that is so hard for some people to do. The time to argue with the police officer is with a lawyer next to you in a court of law. Now, she won't have a chance to do that because she couldn't or wouldn't follow simple instructions.
Link: https://x.com/ScarboroughNow/status/2009005303841632288