Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Upvote this post.

Downvote this post.

Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal

Author: MAS (22243 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 3:51 pm on Jan 25, 2026

View All

for the dead man to bring two magazines to a protest. These people are such dishonest sacks of sheet.

Replies to: "Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal"

Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal - MAS - 3:51pm 1/25/26 (31) [View All]
- Not illegal, just incredibly stupid. Did he urge residents to exercise restraint and common sense? [NT] - LanceManion - 5:16pm 1/25/26
  - The escalation was 100% on ICE (unless you are watching an Earth II video). [NT] - conorlarkin - 6:24pm 1/25/26
    - Law enforcement is provocation, eh counselor? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 7:06pm 1/25/26
      - Reckless unhinged law enforcement = escalation [NT] - conorlarkin - 7:56pm 1/25/26
        You're the one supporting reckless, unhinged behavior.. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 8:14pm 1/25/26
        Only you MAGAmorons are supporting reckless unhinged behavior. [NT] - jimbasil - 8:50pm 1/25/26
        Yes, biting someone’s finger off is perfectly normal behavior. [NT] - Hensou - 10:26pm 1/25/26
        
        Attempting to fight 7+ armed officers is the definition of reckless and unhinged. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 9:10pm 1/25/26
        Agsin, there must be a video copy in braille just for you. [NT] - jimbasil - 9:16pm 1/25/26
      - They have the video in braille just for you. [NT] - jimbasil - 7:53pm 1/25/26
- Why do you need 30 "bullets" for self-defense?!?! Is the question they'd be asking. - iairishcheeks - 4:58pm 1/25/26
  - That part I understand. Hard to hit multiple attackers with single bullet each. [NT] - Hensou - 5:20pm 1/25/26
    - Why bring a gun with 42 rounds to a peaceful protest?!?! - iairishcheeks - 5:47pm 1/25/26
      - That part agree with you. [NT] - Hensou - 6:26pm 1/25/26
- He was disarmed. Then shot. No investigation will ensue. [NT] - Chris94 - 4:32pm 1/25/26
  - This has to be investigated. He wasn’t in possession of gun when shot. [NT] - LanceManion - 5:19pm 1/25/26
    - Agreed. But DHS has already passed judgment. [NT] - Chris94 - 5:42pm 1/25/26
      - Then that is an avoidable major mistake. [NT] - LanceManion - 5:47pm 1/25/26
  - You don’t know that. Each situation is unique. [NT] - Hensou - 4:37pm 1/25/26
- Yes. The Second Amendment is only designed to protect the Kyle Rittenhouse’s in America. [NT] - conorlarkin - 4:04pm 1/25/26
  - In every other context, you folks want the gun prohibited, and of course someone carrying two mags. - MAS - 4:12pm 1/25/26
    - I’m not the hypocrite. - conorlarkin - 4:56pm 1/25/26
    - Assault weapons and weapons of war. Far different than what he was carrying. You all keep inventing - jimbasil - 4:22pm 1/25/26
      - In every other context, you people oppose any civilian carrying around two mags. - MAS - 4:27pm 1/25/26
        Again, you build a false narrative to support your bullshit agenda. [NT] - jimbasil - 4:30pm 1/25/26
        Internet fluffers in their safe space criticizing agents who work in extreme conditions. - ELP - 5:42pm 1/25/26

Consent Management