Why do you need 30 "bullets" for self-defense?!?! Is the question they'd be asking.

Home > Forums > The Open Forum

| Register

Why do you need 30 "bullets" for self-defense?!?! Is the question they'd be asking.

Author: iairishcheeks (29091 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:58 pm on Jan 25, 2026

View All

In fact, I believe that question was asked here about Rittenhouse.

Replies to: "Why do you need 30 "bullets" for self-defense?!?! Is the question they'd be asking."

Minneapolis police chief on Deface the Nation invoking the 2nd Amendment when asked if it was legal - MAS - 3:51pm 1/25/26 (31) [View All]
- Not illegal, just incredibly stupid. Did he urge residents to exercise restraint and common sense? [NT] - LanceManion - 5:16pm 1/25/26
  - The escalation was 100% on ICE (unless you are watching an Earth II video). [NT] - conorlarkin - 6:24pm 1/25/26
    - Law enforcement is provocation, eh counselor? [NT] - iairishcheeks - 7:06pm 1/25/26
      - Reckless unhinged law enforcement = escalation [NT] - conorlarkin - 7:56pm 1/25/26
        You're the one supporting reckless, unhinged behavior.. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 8:14pm 1/25/26
        Only you MAGAmorons are supporting reckless unhinged behavior. [NT] - jimbasil - 8:50pm 1/25/26
        Yes, biting someone’s finger off is perfectly normal behavior. [NT] - Hensou - 10:26pm 1/25/26
        
        Attempting to fight 7+ armed officers is the definition of reckless and unhinged. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 9:10pm 1/25/26
        Agsin, there must be a video copy in braille just for you. [NT] - jimbasil - 9:16pm 1/25/26
      - They have the video in braille just for you. [NT] - jimbasil - 7:53pm 1/25/26
- Why do you need 30 "bullets" for self-defense?!?! Is the question they'd be asking. - iairishcheeks - 4:58pm 1/25/26
  - That part I understand. Hard to hit multiple attackers with single bullet each. [NT] - Hensou - 5:20pm 1/25/26
    - Why bring a gun with 42 rounds to a peaceful protest?!?! - iairishcheeks - 5:47pm 1/25/26
      - That part agree with you. [NT] - Hensou - 6:26pm 1/25/26
- He was disarmed. Then shot. No investigation will ensue. [NT] - Chris94 - 4:32pm 1/25/26
  - This has to be investigated. He wasn’t in possession of gun when shot. [NT] - LanceManion - 5:19pm 1/25/26
    - Agreed. But DHS has already passed judgment. [NT] - Chris94 - 5:42pm 1/25/26
      - Then that is an avoidable major mistake. [NT] - LanceManion - 5:47pm 1/25/26
  - You don’t know that. Each situation is unique. [NT] - Hensou - 4:37pm 1/25/26
- Yes. The Second Amendment is only designed to protect the Kyle Rittenhouse’s in America. [NT] - conorlarkin - 4:04pm 1/25/26
  - In every other context, you folks want the gun prohibited, and of course someone carrying two mags. - MAS - 4:12pm 1/25/26
    - I’m not the hypocrite. - conorlarkin - 4:56pm 1/25/26
    - Assault weapons and weapons of war. Far different than what he was carrying. You all keep inventing - jimbasil - 4:22pm 1/25/26
      - In every other context, you people oppose any civilian carrying around two mags. - MAS - 4:27pm 1/25/26
        Again, you build a false narrative to support your bullshit agenda. [NT] - jimbasil - 4:30pm 1/25/26
        Internet fluffers in their safe space criticizing agents who work in extreme conditions. - ELP - 5:42pm 1/25/26

Consent Management