"Just Wars"...
-----------------
2309 The strict conditions for legitimate defense by military force require rigorous consideration. the gravity of such a decision makes it subject to rigorous conditions of moral legitimacy. At one and the same time:
- the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;
- all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;
- there must be serious prospects of success;
- the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. the power of modem means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.
These are the traditional elements enumerated in what is called the "just war" doctrine.
The evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.
-----------------
Just as nations illegally attacked by an aggressor have the right to use lethal means to stop the threats of harm to their physical, mental and free lives...so too must women be able to terminate totally unwanted pregnancies that were forced or coerced on them if they perceive the physical, mental/emotional and freedom denying threats that could impact them for the rest of their lives to be too great a burden.
The fact that Pope Francis made sure that any priest in the RCC could absolve all those involved in a chosen abortion...and not excommunicate them for doing so...plus stating the fact that the "Personhood" of a fetus is debated...leads one to use "Prudential Judgement" that if 'certain conditions' are met, then an abortion could be accepted, just as in the taking of many lives in a Just War.
We can...and should discuss this more...much more. I'm certainly willing...
btw, I don't question your faith...just your interpretation...let's keep that in mind. Believe it or not, we're after the same goal.