But I did for 2272...Pope Francis overturned the Brazilian Bishop's 'latae sententiae' (automatic)

| Register

But I did for 2272...Pope Francis overturned the Brazilian Bishop's 'latae sententiae' (automatic)

Author: TyroneIrish (23558 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2020)

Posted at 10:42 pm on Feb 3, 2026

View All

Excommunication of all those involved in the abortion conducted for that 9 yr old girl...and furthermore, he eliminated the exclusivity of Bishops making such judgements...allowing all RCC priests the ability to absolve Abortion actions by women, doctors and all those involved through the Sacrament of Reconciliation. That Prudential decision has profound implications for the abortion issue....and you have no comment? Sounds to me like you're avoiding having to acknowledge the truth and reality of the RCC showing mercy and understanding for the horrific injustices that can befall women.

Your silence shows you don't care.

Replies to: "But I did for 2272...Pope Francis overturned the Brazilian Bishop's 'latae sententiae' (automatic)"

Ned, any comment on my reply to your Catechetical references yesterday? [NT] [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 10:05pm 2/3/26 (6) [View All]
- Make your final argument, and then let's give this topic a rest. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 5:34am 2/4/26
- No. You have no comment on Sections 2270-71? - NedoftheHill - 10:21pm 2/3/26
  - But I did for 2272...Pope Francis overturned the Brazilian Bishop's 'latae sententiae' (automatic) - TyroneIrish - 10:42pm 2/3/26
    - Correct. I don't think it is as "profound" as you do, because I'm not trying to twist its meaning. - NedoftheHill - 11:19pm 2/3/26
      - I stipulate that Abortion is a sin...and that an embryo/fetus should be treated "AS" a potential - TyroneIrish - 4:09am 2/4/26
        Because of 2270-71, to answer the question in your last paragraph. - NedoftheHill - 5:31am 2/4/26

Consent Management