ADVERTISEMENT
Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2026 Notre Dame Schedule
    • 2025 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfer Portal
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame Football's NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Classic Notre Dame Football Games
    • Touchdown Jesus
    • Notre Dame Traditions
    • The Fighting Irish
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

So, if you were writing the Constitution today, you would include it.

Author: NedoftheHill  (46432 Posts - Joined: Jun 30, 2011)
Posted at 5:50 pm on Apr 1, 2026
View All

I'm willing to entertain textual and precedential arguments (although precedent is overturnable).

But I'm not sure why we would want to put it in today, if it weren't already there. Most countries don't have it, and the benefits you mention are achievable through legal immigration instead.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

Replies to: “So, if you were writing the Constitution today, you would include it.”

  • Go Barbara! [LINK] - conorlarkin - 8:49am 4/1/26 (10) [View All]
    • Why do you support birth right citizenship? - NedoftheHill - 2:37pm 4/1/26
      • The 14th Amendment and our nation's longtime recognition of it are clear. - conorlarkin - 5:32pm 4/1/26
        • So, if you were writing the Constitution today, you would include it. - NedoftheHill - 5:50pm 4/1/26
          • Yes Enthusiastically. [NT] - conorlarkin - 7:03pm 4/1/26
            • Why not just give US citizenship to everyone in the world? - NedoftheHill - 7:46pm 4/1/26
              • Our laws and Constitution say otherwise. - conorlarkin - 8:14pm 4/1/26
        • In your view, what does "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" mean? [NT] - MarkHarman - 5:34pm 4/1/26
          • See page 7, V of brief. Not a meaningful issue. [NT] - conorlarkin - 7:15pm 4/1/26
    • He’s going to the Supreme Court today - Chris94 - 12:04pm 4/1/26
      • He obviously has nothing better to do. It’s not like he has a war going on or anything. [NT] - Domer From Hell - 2:01pm 4/1/26

Consent Management

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS