I already said I get the historical and precedents argument, so it is strange that you would say I struggle with an argument that I've already said I give credence to.

But my questions relate to why it would be a good idea to implement it today for the first time. You were making an ethical argument, so I engaged you directly. But now you want to talk about history and precedent, which tells me you don't feel very strongly about the independent merits of your position, and you "enthusiasm" comes only from prior court decisions. You've always struggled with ethical arguments.