ADVERTISEMENT
Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2026 Notre Dame Schedule
    • 2025 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfer Portal
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame Football's NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Classic Notre Dame Football Games
    • Touchdown Jesus
    • Notre Dame Traditions
    • The Fighting Irish
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

This is map ruled unconstitutional (while you claim ruling will cause "super charged gerrymandering)

Author: BaronVonZemo  (62870 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)
Posted at 12:24 pm on Apr 30, 2026
View All

There are several issues at play within your posts on this thread - all of them repetitive:

1) You have a problem with the Constitution's electoral system. You want representation based on total population rather than regional representation.
- this is unsurprising coming from a liberal who lives in the NYC region. You want more power to exert you political will on others who think differently.

2) You believe that the ends justify the means (Liberalism Rule #3). When Alito points out the constitutionality of the majority opinion, you respond with a hyperbolic, hypothetical, (and innaccurate) concern about black voter under representation and use that as a reason to imply that the rules shouldn't be applied here, but instead broken to achieve the result that you want.

3) You accuse others of that which you yourselves have been doing (Liberalism Rule #1) - claiming that the ruling will cause "supercharged gerrymandering" when in fact, it just eliminated it as you can see from the map.
You also do this within 1 week of cheering on egregious Democrat gerrymandering in Virginia (which in that case helped your political agenda).


https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/04/6th-congresional-district-displayed-red-126632315.jpg?resize=1024,590&quality=75&strip=all

Replies to: “This is map ruled unconstitutional (while you claim ruling will cause "super charged gerrymandering)”

  • Well done Justice Kagan (p 45) for calling out the GOP as the power hungry racists that they are. [LINK] - conorlarkin - 1:18am 4/30/26 (16) [View All]
    • again, you don’t want equal rights, you want preferential rights [NT] - WestCoastIrishFan - 10:43am 4/30/26
    • The majority says you're full of shit. [NT] - jakers - 1:31am 4/30/26
      • You will be happy when Congress is all white. [NT] - conorlarkin - 1:35am 4/30/26
        • Looks like TDS white guilt is alive and well here. [NT] - ELP - 1:45pm 4/30/26
        • All G.O.P. Pay attention. [NT] - jakers - 1:54am 4/30/26
          • The GOP knows exactly how much this decision favors their political power. [LINK] - conorlarkin - 2:08am 4/30/26
            • So NOW "judicial overreach" is bad. My how far you have "Roe'd" your boat recently. - BaronVonZemo - 2:26am 4/30/26
              • Read the dissent. [NT] - conorlarkin - 2:31am 4/30/26
                • Alito's majority opinion was excellent. Read it. The map was an unconstitutional gerrymander - BaronVonZemo - 2:37am 4/30/26
                  • So when a State that is 30% black has 95% white Congressional representatives, you’ll approve? - conorlarkin - 9:27am 4/30/26
                    • Says the guy who supports 90% Dem rep'n in a 50-50 state. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 12:59pm 4/30/26
                      • How bout it Ned? [NT] [LINK] - conorlarkin - 1:04pm 4/30/26
                    • So only black people can represent black people in Congress? [NT] - MarkHarman - 12:58pm 4/30/26
                    • This is map ruled unconstitutional (while you claim ruling will cause "super charged gerrymandering) [IMAGE] - BaronVonZemo - 12:24pm 4/30/26
                      • The Court has always permitted partisan gerrymandering so long as the consequences were not racial. [LINK] - conorlarkin - 1:03pm 4/30/26
            • 6-3. Sorry if it makes it harder to ballot dump. [NT] - jakers - 2:22am 4/30/26

Consent Management

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS