Not under the JCPOA

Author: Chris94 (38714 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:03 pm on May 7, 2026

View All

They were allowed to enrich to 3.67% and no further. LEU, not HEU. You can use the former for power production and other research-related stuff.

Then Trump canceled the JCPOA for no reason. Then, enrichment.

Replies to: “Not under the JCPOA”

Who’s willing to admit at the end of the day the US will get no better than the JCPOA? [NT] - Quest4twelve - 11:50am 5/7/26 (13) [View All]
- Not under the JCPOA - Chris94 - 4:03pm 5/7/26
  - Oops - meant for the cheeks post below [NT] - Chris94 - 4:21pm 5/7/26
- Iran has admitted to enriching uranium and the only reason to do that is for a weapon - iairishcheeks - 3:35pm 5/7/26
  - They were allowed to but under limited levels, not weapon levels. Otherwise I call BS... - Quest4twelve - 4:00pm 5/7/26
- We will see what happens and for Chris below, yes the Dems might try to spin it. [NT] - THEISMANCARR - 3:01pm 5/7/26
- Are you willing to admit that we are already better off than just the JCPOA? - NedoftheHill - 2:45pm 5/7/26
  - You are absolutely correct. - PaND - 4:17pm 5/7/26
  - Uh, yea, except they now know they can bring the world to its knees. - Chris94 - 4:05pm 5/7/26
  - Paging Dr. Spin...that's all you do. All this to get a JCPOA like agreement. While Americans pay - Quest4twelve - 4:02pm 5/7/26
- I’m looking forward to the spin - Chris94 - 2:07pm 5/7/26
  - The great negotiator will hammer out an artful deal, a deal never seen before. [NT] - jimbasil - 2:08pm 5/7/26
    - We can probably assume he at least won't fund their terrorism. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 2:46pm 5/7/26
      - Ha! The reports I have seen suggest bllions of unfrozen assets. [NT] - Chris94 - 4:04pm 5/7/26

Consent Management