Actually, I see both arguments, so I had assumed it would be a 5-4 split. But Chris would say that cultists don't see nuance.
The intent was clear: birthright citizenship for slaves, but not illegals.
The language did not anticipate the cottage birth industry developing to get US citizenship.
The chances of an Article 5 Amendment to fix the language to match it to the original intent is virtually non-existent. Therefore, we will have to live in a world where some presidents defend the border, and others encourage the trafficking of children.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).