ADVERTISEMENT
Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2026 Notre Dame Schedule
    • 2025 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfer Portal
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame Football's NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Classic Notre Dame Football Games
    • Touchdown Jesus
    • Notre Dame Traditions
    • The Fighting Irish
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
2
Downvote this post.

'Could not corroborate'

Author: Nigel Tufnel  (8401 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 5:01 pm on Jul 7, 2026
View All

In NYT-speak, this means 'chose not to corroborate'.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"I actually understand why Democrat leaders didn't take our stories seriously when the Times reported them in June but are taking them seriously now.

It was by design.

The line most shared from the piece was the claim that the Times “could not corroborate” my story despite talking to two of my friends.

I gave them the contact information for five friends.

They called the two who I clarified would not know about the abuse but would be able to affirm our relationship timeline, events, etc.

They simply did not call the other three.

I also gave them the names of all my former roommates who remembered him stalking our row house (which was about 5 houses down from his) and waiting for me to return. I gave them screenshots of messages between these roommates and I discussing it.

I gave them the names of other men I dated who might have remembered him following us around the hill and showing up on my stoop after we walked home from dates to confront us. I gave them emails to my landlord urgently ending my lease and moving to an apartment across town and diary entries talking about it - all time marked.

I told them that during pre-marital counseling I had spoken to my ex-fiance about the abuse because I had to explain to him why I reacted with such terror any time he lost his temper. They said oh NO we don't need to bother HIM (or my priest). Besides, I had written about it in my diary in detail, they reassured.

As the weeks dragged on I stopped trying to give them evidence because the amount I had already given them seemed to overwhelm them and I thought it meant they clearly had more than enough to verify my every claim.

My friends might not have known the details of the abuse, but they affirmed that yes, I had told them that he was abusive—long before he ran for Senate.

Besides, they assured, my part in their reporting would be small. I thought my details would only serve to affirm Jenny and the other anonymous woman.

Jenny and I - having never met or spoken - both shared with these reporters terrifyingly similar details of intimate partner violence, coercive control, and cycles of abuse/love bombing. The third unnamed woman in the story did as well.

But tell me again how they “could not corroborate.”


Link: NYT

'I define fear as standing across from Joe Louis and knowing he wants to go home early.' - Max Baer

Replies to: “'Could not corroborate'”

  • 'Could not corroborate' [LINK] - Nigel Tufnel - 5:01pm 7/7/26 (7) [View All]
    • Anyone who was taking the NY Times seriously can no longer do so with any measure of credibility. - NedoftheHill - 1:20am 7/8/26
    • D party & libs here chose to ignore Platner's behavior for chance at power & some here defended him - BaronVonZemo - 9:51pm 7/7/26
      • Bernie Sanders, Lizzy Warren, Chris Murphy, Ruben Gallego, Corey Booker all were fan boys. - ELP - 11:45pm 7/7/26
    • This is where the Dems would usually say "there is no evidence" of the alleged event. - NedoftheHill - 8:55pm 7/7/26
      • Uh...he is going to step down. One party has no room for sex predators. [NT] - Chris94 - 9:14pm 7/7/26
        • Only when he couldn't win anymore. You have no standing for any claim against Trump anymore. - BaronVonZemo - 9:52pm 7/7/26
        • You love the "no evidence" statement. - NedoftheHill - 9:36pm 7/7/26

Consent Management

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS