You are unfortunately one of those people unwilling to engage in real discussions about it and instead retreat to non-concepts and non-words to avoid confronting not merely perceptions, but real data. Why do so many East Asians come here and thrive, having little when they arrive, outperforming Euro-Americans?
It's fascinating to watch leftist hypocrisy at work with regards to sexual assaults. Out of one sides of their mouths, they will speak of all the unreported rapes and molestations that occur. They will speak of empowering victims to come forward. Then they make statements like you make here, implying that since no one came forward to reports any rapes, they must not have occurred. Then they support a woman who actively tarred women who came forward with credible allegations against her husband. Then they come up with more non-words to explain away migrant rapes in European cities.
So, am I to understand that "institutional racism" (the most glorious of those non-concepts) explains why one population or one culture engages in exponentially more acts of violence? How does that work, precisely?
What if there is a genetic predisposition for impulsiveness and what if members of particular races who have this predisposition are reproducing at higher rates than other races? Talk of IQ distribution across racial groups is taboo. Can we discuss this other point or is that also taboo? Another fascinating point we all recognize is that when a woman or couple seeks to use a sperm donor to have children, they always are quite careful in choosing donors who lack a violent history, have a higher IQ and so forth. We all recognize that there is some genetic component to this. Yet when we have discussions about it in this context, labels and non-words are employed to silence any further discussion.