Indeed.They refute cheating when exposed, then stupidly argue no guardrails for obvious cheating ave

Author: BaronVonZemo (63589 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 9:32 pm on Jul 14, 2026

View All

because (they falsely claim) there hasn’t been any abuse found. Even if there weren’t cases (of which there are many confirmed), why wouldn’t you shore up cheating opportunities?

The answer is that Dems fully plan to cheat, and voter ID makes that way more difficult to accomplish..

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: “Indeed.They refute cheating when exposed, then stupidly argue no guardrails for obvious cheating ave”

Quest, this is the sort of thing I am talking about. [NT] [LINK] - iairishcheeks - 7:14pm 7/14/26 (11) [View All]
- Why make it harder to vote in order to address a problem that does not exist? - Chris94 - 9:32pm 7/14/26
  - He addresses multiple problems here. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 10:17pm 7/14/26
- All for that...however I still don't think proof of citizenship should be a req to vote - Quest4twelve - 8:31pm 7/14/26
  - To promote trust in the system is the reason. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 8:41pm 7/14/26
    - You discussed data the other day… - Quest4twelve - 9:11pm 7/14/26
      - I don't think we have reliable data. - iairishcheeks - 10:19pm 7/14/26
    - …by preventing cheating. Only those who want to cheat oppose rules to prevent cheating. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 8:47pm 7/14/26
      - Spoken like a true MAGA disciple [NT] - Quest4twelve - 9:11pm 7/14/26
      - "Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome." - Charlie Munger [NT] - iairishcheeks - 8:52pm 7/14/26
        
        Indeed.They refute cheating when exposed, then stupidly argue no guardrails for obvious cheating ave - BaronVonZemo - 9:32pm 7/14/26
        
        So Trump admin couldn’t secure elections but Biden could. - Quest4twelve - 9:40pm 7/14/26

Consent Management