On the one hand, we have a corrupt politician with an army of people within the system (working for the government, working for media) who collude and lie to protect her (and even risk jail in some cases). Her supporters will make any excuse to justify her actions, and refuse to acknowledge here corruption.
On the other hand, we have a non-politician who is opposed by his own party leadership in addition to being opposed by the opposition party...both parties oppose him. Even his own "supporters" admit he is a baffoon.
Which is more likely to become a dictator? Which has the power base to make that play?
Obama has abused his authority, but you refuse to see it. And you don't fear that the most corrupt candidate to ever seek the office will abuse it. But, you fear that Trump will. Maybe the Constitution has been weakened enough. I don't know. I've certainly been complaining about it with past presidents. Maybe you are right. Either way, continued corruption just kicks the can down the road, and may make the medicine that this country needs to take more difficult to swallow. Dictatorship is probably coming in the next 50-100 years, unless drastic action is taken. I think the time to reform is now, not in 20 years. It becomes harder every election.