Are you a warmist? You seem to want to play into their policy language by wrapping policy in the packaging of science.
You say, "How convenient." It hasn't been too convenient for me. I've felt this way for a while, stuck in the middle. I finally found a guy who put a name on what I believe. So, yeah, that was convenient for me. I now have a label.
Warming has been happening for 18,000 years (since the last Ice Age), and it is the best thing to happen to humanity. 97% of scientists think it is continuing at least at a mild pace (some smaller subset believe it is continuing at a faster pace). But the policy makers would have us believe that 97% of scientists believe that ceratin costly and counterproduct policies must be implemented. This guy points out that that is bullshit.
So, what's your label on this issue? Do you have a convenient position?