-the same media now leaking this convenient story.
Why did the Intel services brief congress at the end of Nov that there was no evidence that the Russians could be tied to the Podesta/DNC hacks, and then not notify congress later if they came across new evidence?
And why, when the head Republican on the committee asks for a new briefing for this week does the CIA cancel the meeting at the last minute?
Why would they leak info to the Washpost - one of the media outlets exposed in WikiLeaks to be in collusion - instead of renotifying congress which is the Intel departments required procedure?
Most likely answer: because they want to whip up this frenzy as much as possible to try to influence electoral votes. Podesta and Clinton are still driving this with Obama's passive support.
They can't accept the rejection they got, they are the poorest of losers, and they want to try to steal the election at the end.
If nonClinton people are to believe anything else, the Intel organizations are going to have to reveal how they know - specifics. But it's becoming pretty clear that there aren't any specifics to be shown.
It all appears to be political theater, and I hope the GOP rams it back up their asses when they take over with their majorities if no specifics ever come forward.