Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

False leaps of logic & false claims. Climate has not followed CO2 levels since recorded rise began.

Author: BaronVonZemo (60136 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)
Posted at 11:53 pm on Sep 7, 2021
View All

This is the argument against your claim:

There's no correlation between CO2 and temperature
Twentieth century global warming did not start until 1910. By that time CO2 emissions had already risen from the expanded use of coal that had powered the industrial revolution, and emissions only increased slowly from 3.5gigatonnes in 1910 to under 4gigatonnes by the end of the Second World War.
It was the post war industrialization that caused the rapid rise in global CO2 emissions, but by 1945 when this began, the Earth was already in a cooling phase that started around 1942 and continued until 1975. With 32 years of rapidly increasing global temperatures and only a minor increase in global CO2 emissions, followed by 33 years of slowly cooling global temperatures with rapid increases in global CO2 emissions, it was deceitful for the IPCC to make any claim that CO2 emissions were primarily responsible for observed 20th century global warming.

CO2 levels are demonstrably higher, due primarily to deforestation and carbon emissions add to this. But the link to global temperature has not been made. Is this ecologically good or neutral? I doubt it. But is there scientific evidence of the anthropogenic causality of global climate change? Not that I have seen. Certainly not enough to enact the massive changes that the Paris Accords espouse.

But even if this issue is clearly resolved, then there’s the issue of whether the changes would actually affect the climate significantly. No China and India to start. Countries allowed to buy other countries carbon credits. Dictators being given money to use for green energy production with no way to enforce its proper use, etc.

Let’s all agree to first attack the problem that does not require a new liberal world order…..deforestation.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Replies to: "False leaps of logic & false claims. Climate has not followed CO2 levels since recorded rise began."

  • "One in three Americans have been victimized by extreme weather." - MAS - 11:07pm 9/7/21 (32) [View All]
    • If you're forced off the 6th hole because of a thunderboomer, are you a victim? [NT] - ELP - 7:31am 9/8/21
      • No, you’d be a 5 yr old. [NT] - jimbasil - 7:36am 9/8/21
        • Where did 1 in 3 come from? What is the line between weather victimhood or not? - ELP - 8:03am 9/8/21
          • Biden is prone to using "McStats"... [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 8:42am 9/8/21
          • Thunderboomer? [NT] - jimbasil - 8:09am 9/8/21
            • Way to avoid the questions? So, you don't know the answers. Just say it. [NT] - ELP - 8:50am 9/8/21
              • Reread your original post. - reread my response. - jimbasil - 9:27am 9/8/21
                • Your guy Joe claims 1 in 3 people are victimized by climate change. I'm asking you.................. - ELP - 12:27pm 9/8/21
                  • Okay, my guy said it. And you think I have something to say about it? I don't. What i responded to - jimbasil - 1:07pm 9/8/21
                    • Rage? You don't even know when you guys are being ridiculed..................... - ELP - 3:51pm 9/8/21
                • I’m just a humble lad trying to get some questions answered. [NT] - ELP - 10:51am 9/8/21
                  • There you go ELP. He doesn't know but whatever it is you're wrong. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:26pm 9/8/21
                    • Jimbo is a complete tool, as bad as Tyrone, but in different way. [NT] - ColeyO - 12:55pm 9/8/21
                      • Ty at least has a brain & sense of humor. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 1:48pm 9/8/21
                  • Whatever it is, it's all in your head - 1 - 3? No idea what that means, and don't care. [NT] - jimbasil - 11:50am 9/8/21
            • Bombogenesis. Science has spoken... - TakethetrainKnute - 8:40am 9/8/21
    • Read more. Post less. [LINK] - conorlarkin - 3:48am 9/8/21
      • Maybe you can explain what Biden's pork bill would do about climate change then - Fisher01 - 8:28am 9/8/21
        • Good questions, but since the real goal of the Bill isn’t to fix climate change, he won’t answer. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 1:02pm 9/8/21
        • I've not received a reply to these questions. - jakers - 10:58am 9/8/21
        • He can’t explain anything, don’t bother. [NT] - notredame678 - 8:55am 9/8/21
      • And the proper response is... wait for it... spending many trillions on human infrastructure... - Curly1918 - 5:26am 9/8/21
    • Here's a bit of science for you...what's your explanation for CO2 levels over 410ppm...and [IMAGE] - TyroneIrish - 11:31pm 9/7/21
      • False leaps of logic & false claims. Climate has not followed CO2 levels since recorded rise began. - BaronVonZemo - 11:53pm 9/7/21
        • I believe global temps correlate strongly with the increased removal of female pubic hair since 1970 [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 7:37am 9/8/21
          • Deforestation and terraforming- there’s always a price. :) [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 9:06am 9/8/21
            • The Venus Butterfly Effect [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 4:08pm 9/8/21
        • Deforestation is absolutely a key contributor...BUT...not the greatest contributor to rapidly [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:28am 9/8/21
          • To justify the massive program you suggest, you must do 3 things….. - BaronVonZemo - 9:04am 9/8/21
            • And the third... [NT] [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:16pm 9/8/21
            • Here's the second link... [NT] [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:15pm 9/8/21
            • Your questions are valid...for visibility sake, I'll post three separate links that will answer #1.. [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 12:14pm 9/8/21
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS