Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Really? You're still willing to debate Cheney giving up Plame's name? Amazing.
Author:
jimbasil
(50000 Posts - Joined: Nov 15, 2007)
Posted at 11:02 pm on Mar 21, 2017
View All
(no message)
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
Replies to: "Really? You're still willing to debate Cheney giving up Plame's name? Amazing."
Q from TV tonight: Why is it a crime for Snowden to publish classified info, but not the press?…...
-
BaronVonZemo
- 9:11pm 3/21/17
(23)
[View All]
Because they are not legally bound to protect the classified information.
[NT]
-
conorlarkin
- 12:30am 3/22/17
Leaked Flynn's name? You mean Cheney leaked Plames name don't you? Now that was treason.
-
jimbasil
- 10:34pm 3/21/17
Cheney? [Do you have any credibility left?]
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:52pm 3/21/17
I guess Jim regards the MSM the same as he does Snowden and Cheney.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 11:23pm 3/21/17
Really? You're still willing to debate Cheney giving up Plame's name? Amazing.
[NT]
-
jimbasil
- 11:02pm 3/21/17
You deny the MSM reports that it was Armitage?
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:23pm 3/21/17
Yes, Libby was Cheney's advisor and couldn't have known Plame's name without Cheney telling him.
-
jimbasil
- 11:45pm 3/21/17
Source? Even Novak said that the authorities knew it was Armitage all along, because he cooperated.
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:49pm 3/21/17
Which part of Sooter Libby being convicted for lying in the cover up doesn't sit with you?
-
jimbasil
- 12:01am 3/22/17
"It is known..."
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 12:31am 3/22/17
oops!
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 11:24pm 3/21/17
Snowden didn't publish classified information- he stole it
[NT]
-
CC72
- 9:21pm 3/21/17
Well done.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:38pm 3/21/17
I understand, but it is an contrived difference to pretend that HOW you got the info
-
BaronVonZemo
- 9:30pm 3/21/17
Right or wrong I think the Pentagon Papers set the precedent for publishing classified information
[NT]
-
CC72
- 9:51pm 3/21/17
Re: Right or wrong I think the Pentagon Papers set the precedent for publishing classified information
-
Rooster
- 11:29pm 3/21/17
Right, I'm not comparing Ellsberg with Snowden, just the publishing
[NT]
-
CC72
- 9:37am 3/22/17
So the leak of Hillary's private server was harmful? I don't think so.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:39pm 3/21/17
I refer to the leak of classified govt information. In the case of Hillary's server -
-
BaronVonZemo
- 9:44pm 3/21/17
So if the information isn't classified, it's okay for a govt official to leak it?
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:07pm 3/21/17
I appreciate the acknowledgement that your example was not valid. Now what do you mean by "OK"?
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 11:10pm 3/21/17
You don't know what OK means, really? Try acceptable then.
-
Frank L
- 11:44pm 3/21/17
Oh and if you want classified leaks, try the FBI leaking on the Weiner computer. Was that wrong?
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:54pm 3/21/17