Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
I'm learning a lot about "incidental" intelligence gathering of President-elects.
Author:
Cole
(15033 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)
Posted at 8:48 pm on Mar 23, 2017
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "I'm learning a lot about "incidental" intelligence gathering of President-elects."
Rather huge news if true - NSA to provide smoking gun on Obama surveillance of Trump
[
LINK
]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 7:32pm 3/23/17
(48)
[View All]
Heeeeeere Fido.
-
Chris94
- 10:20pm 3/23/17
Except it didn't involve Russia. Is Fido the former NSA blogger you reference?
-
BaronVonZemo
- 2:31pm 3/24/17
Re: Heeeeeere Fido.
-
jimbasil
- 11:46am 3/24/17
You are confusing "surveillance" with "collection."
-
conorlarkin
- 9:09pm 3/23/17
If not deliberate, then why were the names illegally unmasked? Only one answer...
-
BaronVonZemo
- 2:33pm 3/24/17
It is the same thing
-
Hank Scorpio
- 7:38am 3/24/17
of course--and there is no room for confusion
[NT]
-
Hank the Tank
- 9:38pm 3/23/17
You are ignoring the deliberate & intentional "unmasking" of incidentally collected intelligence.
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:37pm 3/23/17
Wrong. Not how it works.
[NT]
-
conorlarkin
- 9:42pm 3/23/17
You misspelled "Not how it is supposed to work."
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:46pm 3/23/17
Eviidence that it didn't work as normal? Can't wait for the un named sources that Baronbot and you
-
Frank L
- 9:51pm 3/23/17
Read the original post, silly. The evidence is pending. You, the master conspiracy theorist who
-
BaronVonZemo
- 2:39pm 3/24/17
The fact that names were leaked indicates illegal unmasking. Only public evidence required.
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:11pm 3/23/17
The Rosen report is based on an unnamed source. What names were leaked and by who?
-
Frank L
- 10:23pm 3/23/17
Weird. I thought you were saying that the investigation of Trump was intentional.
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:37pm 3/23/17
You're operating at a whole level above Frank - at least a whole level.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 2:42pm 3/24/17
Your fantasies are not close to what I said.
-
Frank L
- 10:46pm 3/23/17
"Evidence please" I'm sorry, but THAT is funny coming from you.
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:00am 3/24/17
My evidence quite simple: Comey, Rogers, Clapper and Nunes.
-
Frank L
- 9:29am 3/24/17
Indeed Frankie. It is quite simple. Our evidence is the same, but you are blinded by irrationality.
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:20am 3/24/17
You have evidence of nothing at this point.
-
Frank L
- 12:04pm 3/24/17
I have the same evidence you have, so you are criticizing your own evidence when you say that.
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:51pm 3/24/17
Man you can be thick sometimes. The evidence is enough to support an ongoing FBI investigation into
-
Frank L
- 1:56pm 3/24/17
Funny. If there is no evidence of surveillance of Trump, then where are the leaks coming from?
-
NedoftheHill
- 3:10pm 3/24/17
What leaks are you attributing to direct surveillance of Trump or his top people?
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 3:13pm 3/24/17
What do you mean by "direct"?
-
NedoftheHill
- 3:24pm 3/24/17
It is a lie according to Comey and Rogers.
-
Frank L
- 3:30pm 3/24/17
Dude, you are the one splitting hairs. You won't answer mine, but I will answer your question.
-
NedoftheHill
- 4:38pm 3/24/17
That has got to be the most obtuse post I have read in a while.
-
Frank L
- 5:17pm 3/24/17
An ongoing investigation begun by political Obama appointees - Jarrett and Comey. BTW….
-
BaronVonZemo
- 2:48pm 3/24/17
Huh? He sunk Hill's boat and kept the Trump inqury secret past November, Baronbot.
-
Frank L
- 3:14pm 3/24/17
I'm learning a lot about "incidental" intelligence gathering of President-elects.
[NT]
-
Cole
- 8:48pm 3/23/17
I hope Trump is learning about it. It will come back in spades later. Won't that be interesting.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:36pm 3/23/17
Uhm I bet it will. When there is a credible investigation of it like the FBI investigation of
-
Frank L
- 7:48pm 3/23/17
You mean the investigation of Trump in which they did no surveillance of Trump? That one?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 8:33pm 3/23/17
Actually, numbnuts it's the one that they did a lot of surveillance on foreigners as I said.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:00pm 3/23/17
You are saying that they launched an official investigation on Trump, but had no probable cause...
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:25pm 3/23/17
Hardly numbnuts. They began and have continued an FBI investigation based upon the standard required
-
Frank L
- 9:33pm 3/23/17
You are the one who is so certain in your beliefs, that you repeatedly start threads on this.
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:35pm 3/23/17
I started this one?
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:36pm 3/23/17
No, you didn't start this one. Why do you ask?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:38pm 3/23/17
Because as usual your statements are overstated.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:39pm 3/23/17
As usual, you draw your own conclusions without support.
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:44pm 3/23/17
untrue. You overstate how often it is I who start the thread and this is an example.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:49pm 3/23/17
"repeatedly"
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:57pm 3/23/17
That is the overstatement, yes.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 10:00pm 3/23/17
Yes, Ned. The spying on Flynn et al was incidental (Frank says so).
[NT]
-
Cole
- 9:06pm 3/23/17
Frankbasil is never mistaken on these types of things.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:33pm 3/23/17