Or maybe he will adopt a 1970's definition of "wire tap" and say that there was no wire tapping because an actual wire was not tapped because no one put a metal clip on a POTS telephone line like they would have had to do in the 1970's.
Next he'll elaborate on the difference between "collusion" and "conspiracy" (the former initially treated like a crime, but later acted like they never intended a crime when no charges made, but then later acted like a crime again...and so on with shifting meanings of words).
We just don't understand nuance like he does. Of course, in his mind, "nuance" is defined as "a cynical political tool and communication technique using secret definitions to advance a political cause by misleading people." We later find out that these secret definitions are known by all true experts, but the definitions are only revealed to the common man when the experts are caught misleading people. Kind of like a statement depending on "what the definition of 'is' is"...or "sexual relations" not including something everyone assumed was included when the sentence was spoken (e.g., oral sex).