there is a loophole, however, that allows insurers to offer a plan with a higher family OOP figure if individual limits are used instead for each member of the family. your plan appears to opt for this. The link is from Cigna itself and explains it.
You are correct on premiums vs. deductibles in section 102(b). That's my mistake. What was changed in cost sharing relates to premiums. ACA requires plans to be benchmarked to 70/30 (you pay 30% of health care costs). The revision is 58/42, which should result in about a 40% increase to premiums. That's not ideal in my opinion.
I stand by the fact that these medicaid cuts will harm people - through an increase in personal bankruptcies and increased deaths. This will greatly affect people who are between the FPL and 3.5x the FPL. That's the working poor and the middle class. They will get less access to worse coverage and when the medicaid expansion is scaled back, many will not have access to that either. This is really going to screw a lot of baby boomers entering low current income periods of their lives in retirement.
I would like to understand what part doesn't go far enough in your opinion.
Link: https://www.cigna.com/assets/docs/about-cigna/informed-on-reform/cost-sharing-limits-fact-sheet.pdf