Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Unanimous. So basic & 101 in law, not worth the judges even putting their signatures on it
Author:
Eli
(8257 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:12 pm on Jun 26, 2017
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "Unanimous. So basic & 101 in law, not worth the judges even putting their signatures on it"
SCOTUS unanimous decision on President's immigration order
-
Curly1918
- 11:06am 6/26/17
(18)
[View All]
Unanimous. So basic & 101 in law, not worth the judges even putting their signatures on it
[NT]
-
Eli
- 4:12pm 6/26/17
The Trinity Lutheran case decided today 7-2 was more important. Notice Kagan "went right."
-
Cole
- 1:13pm 6/26/17
The 2 cases together: Liberals arg'd for foreign Muslim rights & against US Christian rights.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:25pm 6/26/17
This is their fundamental problem with lost congressional seats.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 11:31pm 6/26/17
Great point.
[NT]
-
Cole
- 1:32pm 6/26/17
In part.
-
LanceHarbor
- 11:12am 6/26/17
The Court's ruling was more liberal unConstitutional bullshit
-
CC72
- 5:04pm 6/26/17
Lance makes a good point. I thought the law was 100% on the side of Trump.
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:55am 6/26/17
Yeah, but he gets most of it. Unanimous as well. Big win.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:17am 6/26/17
Agreed. It's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist...
-
Chris94
- 11:41am 6/26/17
Agreed. Sometimes the solution is another election, not a court case creating a new right.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 12:15pm 6/26/17
Legal question:
-
LanceHarbor
- 11:24am 6/26/17
My understanding is that both reviews haven't yet been done.
-
Frank L
- 11:39am 6/26/17
But why haven't they?
[NT]
-
LanceHarbor
- 12:04pm 6/26/17
Looks like the Hawaii court enjoined enforcement of the study as well.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 12:11pm 6/26/17
Interesting. That's silly, if that's the case.
[NT]
-
LanceHarbor
- 12:32pm 6/26/17
My take would be to keep the issue alive.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 12:08pm 6/26/17
I admit I would be asking the same question if I thought non-citizens had a right to immigrate here.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:32am 6/26/17