For example, when you or someone else notes "disparities" in the criminal justice system, I point to the disparities in crime commission rates. The other day, conor trotted out the old one about blacks being sentenced more harshly for identical crimes. I pointed out that these analyses leave out the variable of aggravating circumstances. When police-suspect talk emerges, I point out that white suspect are slightly more likely to be shot by the police, rather than the other way around. If someone claims that our school system targets black students for suspensions/expulsions, I point out the skip/truancy rates at black schools. I asked before what would constitute "proof" that institutional racism does not exist. You didn't respond. I can guess why.
You think the claim that there isn't evidence of institutional racism is a bold one. I don't think it is. Two of the most significant pieces of legislation in our history addressed and ameliorated most of it happened a half-century ago. In addition, and as a result, we saw a radical new socialization on race. There are obviously prejudiced individuals who racially discriminate. There always will be. The idea that I have to prove our institutions don't systematically discriminate is laughable. Were you receptive to the idea that you needed to prove that the election wasn't stolen from Trump, given our nation's history of electoral funny business, or did you hold the position that even despite our history, the people making the initial claim needed to prove it did happen?