You have articulated that one's sex offender status is a justifiable basis for using deadly force, correct? And I gather that in your Wild Wild West America, it wouldn't even matter if the shooter was unaware if the victim is a sex offender, correct?
Your bottom line is that a shooting victim's criminal record determines whether deadly force is justified, correct?
You have also suggested that Mr. Rittenhouse was justified using deadly force upon "the trash that was rioting and doing damage to businesses." So, we are trying to ascertain your parameters about the justification of deadly force when people are engaged in looting or property damage. Who decides who are "trash?" The shooter?
Do you at least differentiate between the property owner using deadly force vs a community watchdog?
Continue to dig yourself a deeper hole.