You -- probably correctly -- feel like they would not have had H.O.F. careers without P.E.D.'s, and so therefore, you feel that's what makes their careers not deserving.
And that's fine - it seems to be the same sentiment from the voters, given the comparison of votes that Bonds (and Clemens) have received relative to McGwire/Sosa. My read of your original email was that their raw career production without the other "data" wasn't H.O.F.-worthy. And that part obviously wouldn't be supported by the numbers.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).