...I asked a straight forward Q for you to answer yes or no in your own words - no innuendo. I honestly wanted to know your answer. As you saw from what you mentioned in previous posts, you could see that there are people (university professors even) who include "minor attraction" in their sexual identity spectrum and that this has been brought up on this board before. I asked, you wouldn't answer which led to some wondering why that was....I asked again. It is beyond me why you would not have simply answered this "no" right from the start.
Regardless, I have a question for you regarding your question to StarkRavingDad:
Stark was wondering why we were not able to simply acknowledge the genetic fact of being male or female, and you responded by asking him the following:
"Are you in favor of making homosexuality a criminal offense like it was in the UK when Alan Turing was cracking the Nazi's enigma code and advancing computer theory".
By your own reasoning, how is this not inferring that StarRavingDad might be a homophobic hater? Why do you not see in yourself what you see in others?
(For the record by the way, I am absolutely against any law that criminalizes homosexual behavior - I am more than willing to answer that if you are wondering).
I asked my question in sincerity, and in fact, when you wouldn't answer the simple yes or no question, I didn't just assume that you wouldn't denounce "minor attraction" at that point. I asked you again. One solution to reaching limits with a poster is to put them on the "ignore" list. I don't do it lightly, but I didn't want to spend time interacting with anyone who supported a concept that I find particularly abhorrent. Again, I am glad that you finally simply answered the question, and your response is the reason that I did not "ignore" you. I was not inferring or trying to paint you as a culprit - I was asking for you to tell me your stance. Do you think Stark should feel that you were inferring that he wants homosexuals thrown in jail because of your question to him, or that you were painting him as a culprit who wants to imprison homosexuals? If not, then why do you feel that way about my inquiry?
Regardless of your answer, I was not inferring, I was asking And I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you didn't answer. If you feel that you are at your limit despite this, then i am fully understanding if you wish to put me on your "ignore" list which is every posters right.