I'm not an attorney, but Frank is, so you can bring him in for an esoteric debate if you wish,

| Register

I'm not an attorney, but Frank is, so you can bring him in for an esoteric debate if you wish,

Author: TyroneIrish (20682 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2020)

Posted at 5:02 pm on Dec 2, 2021

View All

but I've included the attached court finding that supports the ability of the separated families to sue the U.S. government...so I'm asking you, if this goes to trial, is it possible that numerous claims could be awarded that would exceed the oft-discussed settlement payment of $450K?

Unless you have justification for saying this could never end in court, then I see it as clear evidence that Trump and his administration "Screwed Up Royally", thus leaving the Biden administration to clean up the mess and make things right...everything else you're talking about is irrelevant and a distraction...but then that's what Frank has been able to learn about "How You Roll"...and I agree.

Link: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/litigation_documents/separated_family_members_seek_monetary_damages_from_united_states_order_denying_governments_motion_to_dismiss.pdf

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "I'm not an attorney, but Frank is, so you can bring him in for an esoteric debate if you wish,"

A move to stop the insanity. [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 9:32am 12/2/21 (17) [View All]
- It is weird that we would pay immigrants for properly enforcing the law against them. - NedoftheHill - 1:23pm 12/2/21
  - Ned, put your lawyer hat on...this obscene Trump administration fiasco needs to be remedied and the - TyroneIrish - 1:45pm 12/2/21
    - For you, "put your lawyer hat on" = "ignore the law" ...which is why you have no credibility. - NedoftheHill - 2:00pm 12/2/21
      - Anytime a new admin comes in and changes an enforcement policy, the affected people could then sue. - BaronVonZemo - 4:00pm 12/2/21
        Why do you not even TRY to do a little research on the things you care enough to post about? [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 4:36pm 12/2/21
        Pasting a bullshit link does not mean you did research. Let's see if Frank comes to your rescue here [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:52pm 12/2/21
        What's the problem with that link? [NT] - TyroneIrish - 3:10pm 12/3/21
      - Sad to say that Frank has you pegged perfectly...now let's all try to stay on THIS CASE...could this - TyroneIrish - 2:59pm 12/2/21
        Frank is your pal...further credibility destroyed. Frank is famous for lying & never admitting it. - NedoftheHill - 4:13pm 12/2/21
        I'm not an attorney, but Frank is, so you can bring him in for an esoteric debate if you wish, [LINK] - TyroneIrish - 5:02pm 12/2/21
        This is defense motion to dismiss. It is not a judgment. You should have checked with Frank - JarHead4ND - 11:17pm 12/2/21
        Ok, I'll ask you..is there a case here?...and does this motion to dismiss help or hurt the chances - TyroneIrish - 3:16pm 12/3/21
        
        Surely Tyrone reads his links before he posts them, right? [NT] - NedoftheHill - 11:56pm 12/2/21
        When he does he doesn't understand them. - Stark Raving Dad - 12:26am 12/3/21
        Stark, you still haven't responded with an explanation of why you think the "SRY Gene" function - TyroneIrish - 3:31pm 12/3/21
        
        Appeal to authority fails. Jurors can see through lies...even lies by attorneys. - NedoftheHill - 10:50pm 12/2/21
        Is there a tort case here in your estimation?...apparently, the judge thinks so...why don't you? [NT] - TyroneIrish - 3:19pm 12/3/21