But with respect to your misleading account of the FDA's EUA on vaccines for children, I've attached a synopsis of the panel deliberations for your (and all other readers) benefit...in it there is the following excerpt from those who favored going forward with it...in contravention to your implication that the majority favored holding back...yes, there were objections, but as one of the 'retirees' said...she "didn't begrudge" the decision...
-------------------
"While acknowledging the potential risks involved with vaccinating pediatric populations, David Kim, director of the Division of Vaccines, Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy at the Department of Health and Human Services, asked his fellow committee members to consider the risks of not vaccinating children.
“What is the cost of not vaccinating, what is the cost to our children if we do not proceed with a vaccination program? Not only in terms of protecting their health but for the larger public health?” Kim asked."
------------------
I realize this sort of clarification won't swing you, but I feel it important to fill in the HUGE gaps you leave for others who might somehow trust what you say.
Link: https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2021/6/fda-panel-split-on-approach-to-covid-19-vaccines-f